We've been working with Jacksonville short sales long enough for this news to come as both a shock...and not. The shock comes from disbelief that this wasn't always a requirement. The Florida Supreme Court has issued a new mandate for Florida foreclosure filings. It will be interesting to see if this changes anything now that someone is actually liable for knowingly filing fraudulent documents and statements in foreclosure cases. We are not attorneys...we are just short sale specialists that try to help Jacksonville homeowners sell their home through a Jacksonville short sale. We have seen so much and are not happy about the way foreclosures have been occurring.
In a nutshell, attorneys filing Florida foreclosure lawsuits have to tell the truth now or potentially get in trouble for lying.
Now, that may seem like an odd statement to someone who hasn't seen or read about some of the questionable things going on in Jacksonville foreclosure cases and foreclosure cases throughout the state of Florida. But stick with me here...
The Florida Supreme Court has now mandated that those involved with filing Florida foreclosure cases now have to swear, under penalty of perjury, that the allegations and paperwork in a foreclosure case is all....wait for this....TRUE. If you want to do a little heavy reading, this is a link to the document skip to page 13 if you just want to read this part.
Now if you are like me, you are wondering...ummmm...why haven't they always had to tell the truth? But the foreclosure mills who file the majority of the foreclosure cases in Jacksonville and throughout the rest of Florida have been up in arms about this, with many foreclosures continuing to be filed without this. Why are they fighting this requirement to swear under penalty of perjury that the facts alleged are true to the best of their knowledge and belief? Here is a summary of their filings opposing this rule to the task force and the response by the task force to their briefs.
Isn't the writing on the wall? Wouldn't your conclusion be that they KNOW that many (most???) of the cases they have been filing are questionable if not downright fraudulent? Why would they react negatively to something that seems intuitive. They SHOULD swear under penalty of perjury that what they are filing is true to the best of their knowledge. So now they are going to be responsible, to some degree, for what they file.
Most Florida foreclosure cases seemed to be filed now with "lost note" affidavits.
The lender filing the foreclosure is saying that they have simply lost the note or destroyed it so they can't produce the note and prove that they have it. Some filings say that they don't even have a copy of the note, much less the original. Okay, so what's the problem? Many times they don't really have it! This begs the question...does someone else have it? Did they ever have it? Who is this money really owed to?
Florida Legal Services group outlines some of these practices in a letter that was sent to the Supreme Court of Florida Task Force on Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Cases. You can read that letter here.
The Florida Bankers Association says that yes the notes were destroyed because it's "safer, more efficient and less expensive."
The Florida Bankers Association, in their protest to this new rule, admitted in their filing opposing the Task Forces recommendation of the Supreme Court rule that many of these documents were intentionally destroyed ("the physical document was intentionally eliminated") because they were "converted to electronic files almost immediately after the loan is closed." They go on to explain that "individual loans, as electronic data, are compiled into portfolios which are transferred to the secondary market, frequently as mortgage-backed securities." So tell me this. How EASY is it to modify, or duplicate, or sell off yet retain an electronic document? Why very easy, of course. The reasons they quote for doing this is it is "safer, more efficient, and less expensive than maintaining the originals in hard copy." How is this safer? Anyone with a computer and the right software can alter an electronic document. If they have destroyed the note, they can lift a signature off of the mortgage (the mortgage is publicly available to anyone sitting in their living room with internet access) and put it on the supposed note then claim that it is the note. So many possibilities exist if the note only exists electronically. An original, on the other hand, can be examined. The signature can be verified. It is tangible and provable. Much harder to alter or counterfeit.
And so I draw my parallel and other commentary....
Isn't this like me going to the bank, swearing to the teller that Bob, who has a certain bank account number, gave me a check for $1,000. I lost the check or accidentally threw it away, but since Bob gave me the check...I'm still entitled to the money! So they'd better give it to me. Would THAT ever work? Wait, I can fill out an affidavit swearing that I really did have the check and I'm the rightful owner of that check...I can show you my Quicken account where I recorded that I received it, I can show you he has sent me other checks in the past that I have cashed and you gave me the money for. In a million years I would never walk out of that bank with the $1,000. But what if I can show you my iPhone where I have an electronic record of this check. I can show you my picture of this original check that I have since thrown away or destroyed. I mean, WHY KEEP THE CHECK WHEN I HAVE A PICTURE OF IT ON MY iPHONE? I keep all of the pictures of my checks on my iPhone...I can prove that. I can show you my accounting records. They still won't give me the money. But the same bank can take your HOUSE using this procedure.
Note and mortgage not PROPERLY endorsed and assigned? DON'T WORRY! They will just PAY SOMEONE TO DO THAT! (Notice we just did away with the word properly? Who needs THAT?)
Sometimes the bank will "find" the note but it's not endorsed. Supposed assignments have not been recorded. But that's okay...they have a solution for that...they have companies whose job it is to handle all of the endorsements/ assignments on the mortgage and note to show that this is the entity that legally entitled to foreclose. Don't believe me? Look here! Here is one Reuter's article on one such company. Here is a summary of the Florida AGs investigation of this same company. Mortgage never assigned, note never endorsed? NO problem. There's a Florida judge for that. Mortgage assigned and recorded years after being put into a securitized trust? No problem, there's a Florida judge for that too! Mortgage assigned as an afterthought when they are already well into the foreclosure process? Why don't be alarmed...don't you know there's a Florida judge for that? Notice I'm not mentioning the note...ummm...oh yeah...the note...well we can't find it...Surprise, surprise, there IS a Florida judge for that!
Another parallel...that $1,000 check again...
This is like you giving me a check for $1,000 that Bob gave Mary. It's made out to Mary, but Mary gave it to Sue. Sue gave it to Jack. Jack gave it to John. John gave it to you. You gave it to me. Okay, so can I take Bob's check to Mary to the bank and get $1,000 with it? Of course not!!!! But if I was a bank, and this were a note on a house, I could just send it to a company who could magically sign for Mary, Sue, Jack, John and you making this check all of the sudden cashable.
This is not fiction. They are taking people's homes this way.
So why have banks and other lienholders been getting away with this in Jacksonville foreclosures? I can't get money from someone else's bank account with a "lost check" affidavit...how can they take someone's HOUSE with a lost note affidavit? Not sure, but they've been doing it. Many Jacksonville foreclosures, and foreclosures around the state have been completed in this manner.
Can someone please jump on this and run with it? Please? Can the real story be told?
Why aren't more people angry about this? Why isn't the press outraged? The sad fact is most people don't care until it happens to them or someone they love. Well guess what? You should care! It's wrecking your community and your property value. And if you run into unfortunate circumstances down the road, you may find it impossible to sell your own home because of everyone who this has happened to in the past.